Our PPM experts concurred that the time tracking data was at the indication level with forecasts broken down at the work packages level. These forecasts were both for the study and non-study packages. Our team at i2e combined the time tracking details with forecasts. They built visualizations to represent time tracking into buckets based on critical milestones within project plans. This enabled better comparison with algorithm outputs.
This comparison enabled teams and senior management to get insights into how much effort was put in to deliver individual work packages. Resource productivity was also measured by analyzing how much time each resource spent on non-project work.
Instead of analyzing full time engagement or FTE for individual functions, the client now had visibility of FTE expectation for each role within a function. There was more granularity in data collation. Existing reporting techniques were enhanced to include details about forecast demand and resource capacity within teams. Remaining resource forecasts were refined based on effort to date.